Case Study · Automotive · Transmission

Shift-fork carrier. From single-source risk to a dual-sourcing standard.

A European Tier 1 supplier for passenger-car manual transmissions sourced a function-critical shift-fork carrier from a single Indian source. Following a supply failure, the part was transferred into the One-Supplier model within 14 weeks — with two redundant European production sites.

Shift-fork carrier in FN02 sintered metal

Why the part became a project.

The shift-fork carrier (FN02, 18,4 g, 1,8 Mio units/year) had been single-sourced from an Indian MIM manufacturer for seven years. An unplanned production stop due to an energy shortage in Q3 created the risk of a line stoppage within six weeks.

The Tier 1's strategic purchasing department faced three tasks at once: short-term bridging, mid-term dual-source introduction, and a contractual reorganisation involving, ideally, a single creditor rather than two or three new master-data records.

The One-Supplier model made it possible to run both new plants under one existing creditor number — without SRM onboarding and without additional audits on the customer's side.

Material
FN02 (MPIF MIM-2200)
Weight
18,4 g
Annual quantity
1,8 Mio units
Industry
Automotive · Tier 1
Project duration
14 weeks brief to PPAP
Result
Dual sourced · In production

What was presented to the customer.

After ten working days, the normalised matrix was on the desk of the purchasing management. Four plants requested, three technically qualified, two recommended for release.

Plant Region Unit price EXW Lead time series Free capacity Q-Score Total
Plant A Germany · South € 0,94 16 days 130 % 96 93 / 100 · Primary
Plant C Czech Republic € 0,88 20 days 180 % 91 89 / 100 · Secondary
Plant D Poland € 0,86 24 days 90 % 82 74 / 100
Plant E Italy € 1,02 28 days 40 % 88 62 / 100

Weighting: price 25 %, lead time 15 %, capacity 15 %, Q-Score 20 %, audit 10 %, risk 10 %, CO₂ 5 %.

14 weeks. From brief to series.

A condensed, fully documented process. Every step was recorded — customer, MIM Experts and the two network plants always shared the same level of information.

Week 1–2
Briefing & feasibility
Drawing receipt, DfMIM review, feasibility release at both plants. First guide price within 18 hours.
Week 3–6
Tooling & samples
Parallel tool manufacturing at both plants. Moulded samples after weeks 5 and 6. Measurement reports compliant with standards.
Week 7–10
Sampling PPAP 3
Initial sample inspection reports, process-capability study, long-run parts of 50,000 units each.
Week 11–14
Series ramp-up
First series delivery from Plant A in week 12. Plant C in production in parallel from week 14. Overlap with the previous supplier.

What changed for the customer.

0
New creditors
in the ERP
2
Redundant
production plants
−11 %
Unit price
vs. previous supplier
−62 %
Lead time
DE vs. IN
−48 %
CO₂ per part
(transport)
100 %
PPAP level 3
documented
We had an open flank and closed it in under four months — without initiating a new SRM process. The One-Supplier model was the decisive lever for our purchasing department. — HEAD OF STRATEGIC SOURCING · AUTOMOTIVE TIER 1

Do you have a similar situation?

Bottleneck, supplier failure or a planned reshoring — our engineering and purchasing teams assess your component in an initial conversation and outline the project plan.

Discuss your project More references