Case Study · Consumer goods · Electrical appliances

Gearbox gear Z17. Relocation from Asia — 3.2 million parts per year in 26 weeks.

Gearbox gear Z17 in low-alloy sintered metal

Why the part became a project.

A European manufacturer of small electrical household appliances had sourced this gear from China for twelve years. Three reasons forced a relocation: increased customs costs due to CBAM, a quantified CO₂ footprint as an ESG reporting obligation, and two consecutive delivery delays (post-pandemic effects, container-price surge).

The reshoring had already been calculated in commercial terms back in 2023 — but failed on the qualification effort. Two Asian tool sets would have had to be physically transferred to Europe, plus re-qualification at two new suppliers.

In the One-Supplier model, the SRM onboarding of two new suppliers was eliminated. The tools were re-manufactured in Europe (cheaper than transporting the Asian tools). Dual sourcing was planned from the outset.

Material
FN08 (2% Ni, low-alloy steel)
Weight
5,4 g
Annual quantity
3,200,000 units
Industry
Consumer goods · Small electrical
Project duration
26 weeks reshoring
Result
Full EU production · CO₂ −64 %

What was presented to the customer.

The normalised matrix allows a direct comparison of all requested network plants. The primary and secondary sources are released together, so that dual sourcing takes effect from the start of series production.

PlantRegionUnit price EXWLead timeFree capacityQ-ScoreTotal
Plant CCzech Republic€ 0,6420 days150 %9189 / 100 · Primary
Plant DPoland€ 0,6222 days170 %8986 / 100 · Secondary
Plant AGermany · South€ 0,8218 days90 %9475 / 100

Weighting: price 25 %, lead time 15 %, capacity 15 %, Q-Score 20 %, audit 10 %, risk 10 %, CO₂ 5 %.

From brief to series. Documented.

Every step was recorded — customer, MIM Experts and the two network plants always shared the same level of information.

Week 1–4
Reverse engineering
Sample measurement from old stock, material analysis, calculation of sinter shrinkage. Creation of a series-ready CAD model.
Week 5–12
Tools EU
Parallel tool manufacturing at Plants C and D — 16-cavity tools. Rotation of cavities to smooth capacity.
Week 13–18
Dual qualification
PPAP 3 at both plants simultaneously, bundled functional testing by the customer's QA. Release of both sites in the same meeting.
Week 19–26
Ramp-up + Asia phase-out
Staged ramp-up in Europe, parallel phase-out in Asia. 50/50 production in month 5, 100 % EU from month 6.

What changed for the customer.

−64 %
CO₂ per part
(transport + energy)
−9 days
Lead time
on average
+4 %
Unit price
EXW (accepted)
−18 %
Landed cost
(incl. duty/CBAM)
2
Redundant
EU plants
100 %
EU-compliant
from week 26
Reshoring is not just a price issue. For us it was about lead time, CO₂ balance and the ability to respond within three days in the event of a disruption. We now have that. — VP OPERATIONS · CONSUMER GOODS MANUFACTURER

Do you have a similar situation?

Bottleneck, supplier failure or a planned reshoring — our engineering and purchasing teams assess your component in an initial conversation and outline the project plan.

Discuss your project More references